If PDF does not display, click here to download

1
권종희/사회복지프로그램 평가 결과 활용의 영향요인에 관한 연구/한국사회복지행정학/2013/15(2)/217~252/한국사회복지행정학회/ Google Scholar ›
2
김대영/중소기업의 구조화된 현장 훈련(SOJT) 프로그램에 대한 이해관계자 집단의 평가 요구 비교 분석: 논리 지향 평가 모형을 중심으로/Korea Business Review/2012/16(4)/203~230/한국경영학회/ Google Scholar ›
3
김대영/논리 지향 평가 실행 수준과 평가 결과 활용의 관계에 대한 평가의 질의 조절 효과 : 중소기업 구조화된 현장 훈련(SOJT) 프로그램을 중심으로/HRD연구/2013/15(2)/165~194/한국인력개발학회/ Google Scholar ›
4
Q방법론/김헌수/교육과학사/2000/~/// Google Scholar ›
5
김형진/평가결과 활용의 영향요인 탐색/정책분석평가학회보/2011/21(2)/129~157/한국정책분석평가학회/ Google Scholar ›
6
Q방법론-과학철학, 이론, 분석, 그리고 적용/김흥규/커뮤니케이션북스/2008/~/// Google Scholar ›
7
박소연/기업의 조직풍토가 프로그램 평가 결과 활용에 미치는 영향/인력개발연구/2005/7(2)/27~46// Google Scholar ›
8
박소연/HRD 프로그램 평가의 질이 평가결과 활용에 미치는 영향/HRD연구/2009/11(2)/27~47/한국인력개발학회/ Google Scholar ›
9
박소연/평가에 대한 HRD 이해관계자들의 인식 탐구 : Q 방법론을 중심으로/HRD연구/2010/12(4)/95~117/한국인력개발학회/ Google Scholar ›
10
인적자원개발론/배을규/학이시습(커뮤니케이션북스)/2009/~/// Google Scholar ›
11
HRD 실무자를 위한 교육훈련 프로그램 평가/배을규/학이시습/2012/~/ Google Scholar ›
12
배을규/통합적 평가 접근법을 활용한 HRD 프로그램 평가 모형 개발: 학교·사회 예술강사 기본 연수 평가 모형 개발 사례를 중심으로/HRD연구/2014/16(4)/25~50/한국인력개발학회/10.18211/kjhrdq.2014.16.4.002 Google Scholar ›
13
배을규/HRD 컨설턴트의 리더-구성원 교환관계(LMX)와 경력 몰입의 관계에 대한 무형식 학습 활동의 매개효과/대한경영학회지/2013/26(7)/1865~1885/대한경영학회/ Google Scholar ›
14
배을규/HRD 컨설턴트의 경력 정체, 조직 몰입, 이직 의도의 관계/직업교육연구/2014/33(1)/223~244/한국직업교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
15
교육프로그램 평가론/배호순/원미사/2008/~/// Google Scholar ›
16
송영수/국내 대기업 인적자원개발(HRD) 동향 탐색/Korea Business Review/2013/17(2)/1~24/한국경영학회/ Google Scholar ›
17
윤재영/사회복지시설평가 결과에 대한 피평가시설의 도구적 활용/한국사회복지행정학/2010/12(1)/89~116/한국사회복지행정학회/ Google Scholar ›
18
이원석/우리는 왜 프로그램을 평가하는가?/교육평가연구/2013/26(1)/1~13/한국교육평가학회/ Google Scholar ›
19
이혜영/평가영향의 관점에서 평가결과 활용에 관한 연구: 지방자치단체 합동평가를 중심으로/한국사회와 행정연구/2005/16(1)/131~149/서울행정학회/ Google Scholar ›
20
인적자본기업패널 기초분석보고서/한국직업능력개발원/한국직업능력개발원/2008/~/ Google Scholar ›
21
A Guide for Evaluation Decision Makers/Alkin, M. C/Sage/1985/~/// Google Scholar ›
22
배을규/A Pragmatic Evaluation Approach to Measure Training Efficiency and Effectiveness: Enhancing Utilization of Training Evaluation/Andragogy Today: Interdisciplinary Journal of Adult & Continuing Education (IJACE)/2003/6(2)/79~101/한국성인교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
23
Beyer, J. M/The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings/Administrative Science Quarterly/1982/27/591~622// Google Scholar ›
24
Boettcher, D. L/A Follow-up of Two Guidance Program Evaluation Projects Assessing the Degree of Implementation of Recommendations and the Influence of Factors which Affect Utilization/Boston College Graduate School of Arts and Sciences department of education/1991/~// Google Scholar ›
25
Political Subjectivity: Application of Q Methodology in Political Science/Brown, S. R/Yale University Press/1980/~/// Google Scholar ›
26
Caplan, N/Social Research and National Policy: What Gets Used, by Whom, for What Purposes, and with What Effects/International Social Science Journal/1976/28(1)/187~194// Google Scholar ›
27
Chaudlhuri, S/The relationship between training outsourcing and employee commitment to organization/Human Resource Development International/2014/17(2)/145~163// Google Scholar ›
28
Cousins, J. B/Current Empirical Research on Evaluation Utilization/Review of Educational Research/1986/56/331~364// Google Scholar ›
29
Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines/Fitzpatrick, J. L/Pearson/2004/~/// Google Scholar ›
30
Organizational Learning, Performance, Change: An Introduction to Strategic Human Resource Development/Gilley, J. W/Basic Books/2000/~/// Google Scholar ›
31
King, J. A/Evaluation Utilization: An Annotated Bibliography/NIE grant 80-0082/1981/~// Google Scholar ›
32
Leviton, L/Research on the Utilization of Evaluations/Evaluation Review/1981/5(4)/525~548// Google Scholar ›
33
McCormick, E. R/Factors Influencing the Use of Evaluation Results/박사/The University of Minnesota//1997 Google Scholar ›
34
Nickols, F. W/Why a Stakeholder Approach to Evaluating Training/Advances in Developing Human Resources/2005/7(1)/121~134// Google Scholar ›
35
Owen, J. M/Towards a Meta-Model of Evaluation Utilization/Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association/1992//~/ Google Scholar ›
36
Utilization-focused Evaluation/Patton, M. Q/Sage/2008/~/// Google Scholar ›
37
New Directions for Program Evaluation/Preskill, H/Jossey- Bass/1991/49~///The Cultural Lens: Bringing Utilization into Focus Google Scholar ›
38
Performance Consulting: A Practical Guide for HR and Learning Professionals/Robinson, D. G/Berrett-Koehler Publishers/1995/~/// Google Scholar ›
39
Evaluation in Organizations: A Systematic Approach to Enhancing Learning, Performance, and Change/Russ-Eft, D/Perseus Publishing Services/2001/~/// Google Scholar ›
40
Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of practice/Shadish, W. R/Sage/1991/~/// Google Scholar ›
41
International Encyclopedia of Education/Stake, R. E/Pergamon/1983/~///Responsive Evaluation Google Scholar ›
42
Stephenson, W/Principles for the Study of Subjectivity/Operant Subjectivity/1981/4(2)/37~53// Google Scholar ›
43
Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation/Stufflebeam, D. L/Kluwer Academic Pub/2000/33~83///Foundational Models for 21st Century Program Evaluation Google Scholar ›
44
Evaluation Theory, Models and Applications/Stufflebeam, D. L/Jossey-Bass/2007/~/// Google Scholar ›
45
Sunesson, S/Explaining Research Utilization/Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization/1989/10(2)/140~155// Google Scholar ›
46
Weiss, C. H/Measuring the Use of Evaluation/Evaluation Practice/1981/9(3)/87~92// Google Scholar ›
47
Six Disciplines of Breakthrough Learning : How to Turn Training and Development into Business Result/Wick, W/John Wiley & Sons International Right, Inc/2010/~/// Google Scholar ›
48
Program Evaluation/Worthen, B. R/Longman/1997/~/// Google Scholar ›
49
The Program Evaluation Standards/Yarbrough, D. B/Sage/2011/~/// Google Scholar ›

An Analysis on the Type of HRD stakeholders’ Subjective Perception on Utilization of HRD Program Evaluation Results : Focusing on HRD Practitioners, Consultants, and Researchers