If PDF does not display, click here to download

1
A Guide for Evaluation Decision Makers/Alkin, M. C./Sage/1985/~/// Google Scholar ›
2
Alkin, M. C./Thoughts on Evaluation Utilization, Misutilization and Non-Utilization/Studies in Educational Evaluation/1988/14(3)/331~340// Google Scholar ›
3
Ash, K./Educators Evaluate “Flipped Classrooms/Education Week/2012/32/6~8// Google Scholar ›
4
Flip Your classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every day, Oregon/Bergmann, J./International Society for Technology in Education/2012/~/// Google Scholar ›
5
Bishop, J. L./The flipped classroom: A survey of the research/ASEE National Conference/2013//~/ Google Scholar ›
6
Bundi, P./Does evaluation quality enhance evaluation use?/Evidence & Policy/2021//1~27// Google Scholar ›
7
Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education/Caffarella, R. S./Jossey-Bass/2000/~///Linking the individual learner to the context adult learning Google Scholar ›
8
Heeseung Choi/Applying the Flipped Learning Model to an English-Medium Nursing Course/Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing/2015/45(6)/939~948/한국간호과학회/ Google Scholar ›
9
Clark, R. E./Media will never influence learning/Educational Technology Research and Development/1994/42(2)/21~29// Google Scholar ›
10
Cook, T. D./Metaevluation/Evaluation Quarterly/1978/2(1)/5~51// Google Scholar ›
11
Cousins, J. B./Current empirical research on evaluation utilization/Review of Educational Research/1986/56/331~364// Google Scholar ›
12
Program evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines/Fitzpatrick, J./Allyn & Bacon/2011/~/// Google Scholar ›
13
Frey, K./Revising road safety policy : the role of systematic evidence in Switzerland/Governance/2010/23(4)/667~690// Google Scholar ›
14
Hamdan, N./The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review/Flipped Learning Network/2013//1~17// Google Scholar ›
15
The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species/Knowles, M. S./Gulf/1990/~/// Google Scholar ›
16
Ledermann, S./Exploring the necessary conditions for evaluation use in program change/American Journal of Evaluation/2012/33(2)/159~178// Google Scholar ›
17
McCormick, E. R./Factors Influencing the Use of Evaluation Results/doctoral/University of Minnesota//1997 Google Scholar ›
18
Oliver, K./Evaluating unintended consequences : New insights into solving practical, ethical and political challenges of evaluation/Evaluation/2020/26(1)/61~75// Google Scholar ›
19
Utilization-focused Evaluation: The New Century Text/Patton, M. Q./Sage/1997/~/// Google Scholar ›
20
Penninckx, M./Explaining effects and side effects of school inspections: a path analysis/School Effectiveness and School Improvement/2016/27(3)/333~347// Google Scholar ›
21
New Directions for Program Evaluation 89/Preskill, H./Jossey- Bass/1991/~///The cultural lens: Bringing utilization into focus Google Scholar ›
22
Evaluation: A Systematic Approach/Rossi, P. H./Sage/1982/~/// Google Scholar ›
23
The Art of Case Study Research/Stake, R. E./Sage/1995/~/// Google Scholar ›
24
Strayer, J./How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation/Learning Environments Research/2012/15/171~193// Google Scholar ›
25
Stevens, C. J./What constitutes misuse?/New Directions for Program Evaluation/1994/64/3~13// Google Scholar ›
26
Stufflebeam, D./The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability/Journal of Research and Development in Education/1971/5(1)/19~25// Google Scholar ›
27
Stufflebeam, D./A standards-based perspective on evaluation/Advances in Program Evaluation/1997/3/61~88// Google Scholar ›
28
Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation/Stufflebeam, D./Kluwer Academic Publishers/2000/~///The CIPP Model for Evaluation Google Scholar ›
29
New Directions for Evaluation 89/Stufflebeam, D./Jossey-Bass/2001/~///Evaluation Models Google Scholar ›
30
International Handbook of Educational evaluation/Stufflebeam, D./Thomas Kellaghan/2003/~///The CIPP Model for Evaluation Google Scholar ›
31
Evaluation Roots/Stufflebeam, D./SAGE/2004/245~266///The 21st Century CIPP Model Google Scholar ›
32
Encyclopedia of Evaluation/Stufflebeam, D./Sage/2005/~///CIPP model (context, input, process, product) Google Scholar ›
33
Evaluation theory, models, & applications/Stufflebeam, D./Jossey-Bass/2007/~/// Google Scholar ›
34
The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and accountability/Stufflebeam, D./Guilford/2017/~/// Google Scholar ›
35
The Program Evaluation Standards/Yarbrough, D. B/Sage/2011/~/// Google Scholar ›
36
Case Study Research Design and Methods/Yin, R. K./Sage/2003/~/// Google Scholar ›
37
New Directions for Program Evaluation for 64/Vroom, P. I/Jossey-Bass/1994/49~60///Confronting ideology and self-interest: Avoiding misuse of evaluation Google Scholar ›
38
고용노동부/재택근무 활용실태 설문조사결과//2020/~// Google Scholar ›
39
고형준/Digital S-OJT(구조화된 현장훈련) 학습시스템의 성공요인에 관한 탐색적 연구/경영교육연구/2015/30(3)/317~347/한국경영교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
40
일학습병행 이슈분석 운영 사업 Ⅰ/김대영/한국산업인력공단․한국직업능력개발원/2020/~/// Google Scholar ›
41
김대영/중소기업의 구조화된 현장 훈련(SOJT) 프로그램에 대한 이해관계자 집단의 평가 요구 비교 분석: 논리 지향 평가 모형을 중심으로/Korea Business Review/2012/16(4)/203~230/한국경영학회/ Google Scholar ›
42
김대영/논리 지향 평가 실행 수준과 평가 결과 활용의 관계에 대한 평가의 질의 조절 효과 : 중소기업 구조화된 현장 훈련(SOJT) 프로그램을 중심으로/HRD연구/2013/15(2)/165~194/한국인력개발학회/10.18211/kjhrdq.2013.15.2.007 Google Scholar ›
43
김대영/HRD 프로그램 평가 결과 활용에 대한 이해관계자들의 주관적 인식 유형 분석 : HRD 담당자, 컨설턴트, 연구자를 중심으로/Korea Business Review/2015/19(1)/227~248/한국경영학회/ Google Scholar ›
44
김영민/e-Learning에서 학습실재감, 학습몰입 및 학습성과의 관계/e-비즈니스연구/2018/19(3)/99~115/국제e-비즈니스학회/10.20462/TeBS.2018.6.19.3.99 Google Scholar ›
45
김정민/재택근무도 ‘부익부 빈익빈’… 대기업 60.9%Vs 중소기업 36.8%/이데일리/2020/~// Google Scholar ›
46
김효근/e-Learning 실행 및 관리를 위한 모니터링 도구의 개발/Korea Business Review/2005/8(2)/185~214/한국경영학회/ Google Scholar ›
47
권순달/교육 평가의 오용과 남용/교육평가연구/2013/26(4)/739~754/한국교육평가학회/ Google Scholar ›
48
박기찬/공기업 경영평가시스템에 대한 특성비교 : 프랑스 공기업의 평가사례를 중심으로/Korea Business Review/2008/12(2)/23~54/한국경영학회/ Google Scholar ›
49
박소연/HRD 프로그램의 반응평가에 대한 메타평가 연구/기업교육과인재연구/2008/10(2)/119~137/한국기업교육학회/ Google Scholar ›
50
박소연/HRD 프로그램 평가의 질이 평가결과 활용에 미치는 영향/HRD연구/2009/11(2)/27~47/한국인력개발학회/10.18211/kjhrdq.2009.11.2.002 Google Scholar ›
51
배성희/간호교육에서 플립 러닝의 효과와 전략에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰/Health & Nursing/2018/30(2)/1~9// Google Scholar ›
52
기업 교육훈련 평가의 동향과 과제-무엇을 어떻게 평가할 것인가?/배을규/한국산업인력공단/2012/~/// Google Scholar ›
53
배을규/통합적 평가 접근법을 활용한 HRD 프로그램 평가 모형 개발: 학교·사회 예술강사 기본 연수 평가 모형 개발 사례를 중심으로/HRD연구/2014/16(4)/25~50/한국인력개발학회/10.18211/kjhrdq.2014.16.4.002 Google Scholar ›
54
서장욱/온라인 기반 대학교육 환경에서 학습자 실재감 강화를 위한 교수설계자의 실천과제 연구/학습자중심교과교육연구/2020/20(8)/695~718/학습자중심교과교육학회/http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.8.695 Google Scholar ›
55
전환기의 HRD, 연구의 흐름을 읽다/성세실리아/박영스토리/2020/~///현업 HRD 담당자들의 인식을 통한 Kirkpatrick 평가의 반성적 고찰 Google Scholar ›
56
송영수/국내 대기업 인적자원개발(HRD) 동향 탐색/Korea Business Review/2013/17(2)/1~24/한국경영학회/ Google Scholar ›
57
유하나/간호대학생의 전공교과목 플립러닝 수업에 대한 경험: 질적연구/실천공학교육논문지/2020/12(1)/11~21/한국실천공학교육학회/http://dx.doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2020.011 Google Scholar ›
58
원격훈련 및 현장훈련 개선방안 연구/이수경/한국직업능력개발원./2015/~/// Google Scholar ›
59
이수경/이러닝 직업교육훈련에 대한 학습자 수강동기, 인식, 학습행태 조사연구/디지털콘텐츠학회논문지/2017/18(3)/499~508/한국디지털콘텐츠학회/http://dx.doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2017.18.3.499 Google Scholar ›
60
이원석/CIPP 평가 모형의 지향 원칙과 국내 교육 분야 CIPP 평가 모형 활용 연구 고찰/교육평가연구/2019/32(4)/603~624/한국교육평가학회/http://dx.doi.org/10.31158/JEEV.2019.32.4.603 Google Scholar ›
61
온라인 대학 교육/이정기/커뮤니케이션북스/2015/~/// Google Scholar ›
62
임연욱/고등교육에서의 콘텐츠 러닝타임(running time)에 관한 학습자 인식 및 실태 분석/학습과학연구/2012/6(2)/61~78/교육공학연구소/ Google Scholar ›
63
정민하/본사 직원은 재택, 현장직은 현장 근무...코로나가 부른 또다른 격차/조선비즈/2020/~// Google Scholar ›
64
정은정/현업 HRD 담당자들의 Kirkpatrick 평가 모형에 대한 인식: 적용 현장에서의 장점, 한계, 개선 방향을 중심으로/HRD연구/2016/18(3)/115~143/한국인력개발학회/10.18211/kjhrdq.2016.18.3.005 Google Scholar ›
65
한국경영자총협회/사회적 거리두기에 따른 매출 100대 기업 재택근무 현황 조사//2020/~// Google Scholar ›
66
정은정/컴퓨터 매개 통신을 이용한 협력학습 환경에서 질문생성훈련이 문제해결과정에 미치는 영향/교육공학연구/2000/16(1)/201~222/한국교육공학회/ Google Scholar ›

A Case Study on Program Evaluation Using Orientation Principles of the CIPP Evaluation Model and Program Evaluation Standards